Thursday, October 08, 2026
Verónica Lombardo:
A Latin American company invested millions in Copilot.
Licenses for the whole team. Technical training. The year’s flagship project.
Eight months later: 11% actual adoption.
What went wrong?
Nothing technical. Absolutely nothing technical.
What was missing wasn’t in the IT roadmap or the Microsoft contract. What was missing was narrative. Context. Someone to tell people what all of this meant for their work, their career, their future inside that organization.
That’s not a technology problem.
That’s exactly the work of HR and Internal Communication.
The number you should have on your screen
Sandy Carter, former Amazon Web Services executive, said it plainly at SXSW 2026: 95% of AI projects fail. Not because of the model. Not because of the budget. Because of poor organizational frameworks.
Translation: because of people.
And there’s a second number that completes the picture: 97% of employees say they personally benefit from AI. But only 23% of companies see significant ROI.
AI is working for people. And failing for organizations.
There’s a gap between the two. And that gap has a name: the internal communication void.
The Fire Triangle
I developed a model to visualize what’s at stake in any AI transformation. I call it the Fire Triangle of Adoption.
If you’ve ever sat through a safety training, you know it: fire needs three elements at the same time. Fuel. Heat. Oxygen. Remove any one of them, and fire doesn’t happen.
In your organization, all three elements are already on the table.
Fuel is fear.
Your people’s uncertainty, the silent disengagement, those who’ve already decided to leave but haven’t said so yet. 54% of the C-Suite admits that AI adoption is fracturing their company. It’s not bad faith. It’s that no one managed the fear.
Fear exists in every organization going through transformation. You can’t eliminate it.
Heat is speed.
Board pressure, project timelines, efficiency announcements. It doesn’t stop. The transformation won’t wait for you.
You can’t control the heat either.
Oxygen is the communication void.
The silence between what the organization is planning and what people know. Decisions announced without narrative. Rumors filling the space the organization left empty. Middle managers absorbing pressure from above and below, with no tools to mediate either.
And here’s the insight that changes everything:
You can’t eliminate the fuel. You can’t control the heat. The only element in your hands is the oxygen.
Manage the narrative. Close the gap before the fire finds it.
That’s not an IT problem. That’s exactly the work of HR and Internal Communications.
Do any of these sound familiar?
The triangle may already be burning in your organization, even if you can’t see the smoke yet:
→ Your organization launched the copilot months ago and adoption isn’t improving, even though technically “everything works”
→ Middle managers have no answer when their teams ask “what does this actually mean for us?”
→ HR was handed the mission to “support adoption” with no budget and no clear method
→ Glassdoor or LinkedIn already have comments about uncertainty or “lack of communication around the changes”
→ Your organization announced the transformation externally before explaining it internally
If three or more sound familiar, the communication void already exists. The question isn’t whether there’s oxygen. The question is how much.
The territory HR and IC haven’t claimed
Every time I talk with HR and Internal Communications leaders in LATAM, I hear the same tension: AI transformation is the organization’s number one priority, but IC is arriving late to that conversation.
Not because they have nothing to contribute. Quite the opposite.
HR and IC teams have exactly what most AI projects are missing: knowledge of the culture, tools to manage change, credibility with people, the ability to build internal narrative.
The problem is that nobody is positioning it that way. Not the organizations, which keep assigning the transformation to IT or external consultants. Not the IC teams themselves, which wait to be invited in instead of walking in with a proposal.
Liza Adams led the transformation of a 25-person team into a hybrid human-AI organization. The numbers are extraordinary: 75% faster content creation, 35% improvement in campaign performance. But what interests me most about her story isn’t the result — it’s what slowed her down at the start: people who told her they wouldn’t participate because they were afraid of losing their jobs.
The change happened because someone managed the fear. Because someone built the narrative.
Is anyone doing that in your organization?
The organization that communicates its transformation well doesn’t just survive
It becomes a talent attraction argument. In 2026, that’s worth more than salary.
When the oxygen is managed, the transformation doesn’t just move forward — it becomes an employer brand asset. People who see how their organization navigates AI with honesty, clarity, and space for hard questions — those people stay, recommend the place, and bring others.
Those who don’t see it leave. And they talk.
It’s already happening. In the first quarter of 2026 alone, around 40,000 people lost their jobs in the technology industry globally. Most left without narrative, without context, without tools. Straight to LinkedIn and Glassdoor.
The reputational damage was proportional to the silence that came before.
How much oxygen is circulating in your organization today?
If something you read resonated, it might be time for that diagnostic.
Write to me directly. Tell me what stage your organization’s AI transformation is at, and what role IC plays in that conversation today.
With that, I’ll give you an initial strategic read of where you stand — no charge, no generic formulas.
→ linkedin.com/in/vero-lombardo
+++
Verónica Lombardo, Employer Branding and Internal Communications Strategist · Creator of the BRIDGE Method · LinkedIn Top Voice HR 2026 · LATAM & Spain
© 2026 Stratpair Ltd., trading as Strategic. Registered in Ireland: 747736